Legal Opinion
Aktiebolaget Bofors v. United States (Two Cases). Aktiebolaget Bofors v. Acheson, Secretary of State
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 29, 1951No. 10870-10872_1PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, Aktiebolaget Bofors, instituted these three actions in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on April 17, 1950. All three complaints, which contained substantially similar factual allegations and had the *147same general objective, were dismissed by the trial judge, and these appeals followed.
We summarize the allegations of the complaints. Bofors, a Swedish corporation engaged in manufacturing and selling munitions, was the owner of an unpatented secret process by the use of which it produced a 40mm anti-aircraft gun,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Peabody v. NorfolkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- AO Smith Corporation v. Petroleum Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Booth v. Stutz Motor Car Co. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Almour v. Pace, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Hyde Corporation v. HuffinesTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- S.O.S., Inc. v. Payday, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Arbitraje Casa De Cambio, S.A. De C v. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Kansas City Power & Light Company v. Douglas McKay Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.