Legal Opinion
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 20, 2005PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge PELLEGRINI.
DaimlerChrysler Corporation (Seller) appeals from portions of two orders of the Board of Finance and Revenue denying its requests for refunds of sales tax paid on various vehicles it was required to repurchase from dissatisfied customers under the Pennsylvania Automobile Lemon Law (Lemon Law).1
This case has been consolidated from two separate appeals which have similar facts and the same issue on appeal. Both cases (279 F.R.2004 and 468 F.R.2004, respectively) involve Seller, a manufacturer and seller of Chrysler/Dodge vehicles, who repurchased its vehicles from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ciccarelli v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- William R. Jewson v. Mayo ClinicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Star v. RosenthalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- City of Philadelphia v. City of Philadelphia Tax Review Board ex rel. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Deek Investment, L.P. v. Murray, F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Quest Diagnostics Venture, LLC v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.