Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. City of Philadelphia Tax Review Board ex rel. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 2015PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

These cross-appeals involve tax credits and refunds for overpayments of the City of Philadelphia’s Business Privilege Tax (BPT).1 The City appeals from the Commonwealth Court’s decision affirming the award of credits to Keystone Health Plan East, Inc., and QCC Insurance Company (collectively, Taxpayers), who appeal from the same decision affirming the denial of their refund requests.

In 1985, pursuant to the First Class City Business Tax Reform Act, 53 P.S. §§ 16181-16193, the City enacted the BPT, which taxes the gross receipts and net income of every person engaged in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Lacey Nursing Center, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Warrantech Consumer Products Services, Inc. v. Reliance Insurance Co. in LiquidationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Household Consumer Discount Co. v. VespazianiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Bailey v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Vandegrift v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Kornfeind, W. v. New Werner Holding Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Downingtown Borough (Friends of Kardon Park,Aplts)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Mission Funding Alpha v. Commonwealth, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Kornfeind, W. v. New Werner Holding Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API