Legal Opinion

Hoesly v. Hogan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed November 9, 1938:

Martin, J.

There is no dispute as to the facts. The appellants contend that the county court erred in holding *601that the homestead exemption superseded the appellants’ lien under the judgment of the circuit court. It appears that on the date the judgment was entered and docketed in the circuit court, Mrs. Hogan owned a one-hundred-seventeen-acre farm in Green county which did not then constitute her homestead. Mrs. Hogan moved on this farm March 1, 1933. It then became her homestead and remained such continuously until her death on September 16,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pasco v. HarleySupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Musa v. Segelke & Kohlhaus Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Berger v. BergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Papenthien v. CoerperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Bridge v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Northern State Bank v. ToalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Sheehan v. Estate of GambergAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re ArnhoelterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
  4. Qualley v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Reynolds v. Sisco Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API