Papenthien v. Coerper
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed April 8, 1924:
Owen, J.
Sec. 2203, Stats., declares every agreement by a married man to alienate his homestead or any interest therein to be void unless the wife’s consent thereto is evidenced by her act of joining in the deed, mortgage, or other conveyance. The homestead law will be liberally construed to effectuate its design. Zimmer v. Pauley, 51 Wis. 282, 8 N. W. 219. It has been held that
“The bona fide intention of acquiring the premises for a homestead, without defrauding any one, evidenced by overt acts in fitting them to become such, followed by actual…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Scofield v. HopkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Wall v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Jost v. WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- McCabe v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Henrikson v. HenriksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Doyle v. FischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. SchuerbrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Wilcox v. CoumbeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Pauly v. PaulySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Kessler v. OlenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.