Legal Opinion
Musa v. Segelke & Kohlhaus Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1937PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
The undisputed facts are that on July 22, 1915, when the plaintiff, Julia Musa, was the wife of Adam Musa, *434the premises in question were conveyed to them, as husband and wife, and the survivor of them; that the defendant Segelke & Kohlhaus Company is the owner of an unpaid judgment for $805.87, obtained and docketed against Adam Musa on April 7, 1928, in the civil court of Milwaukee county; that he died in 1932; that no execution was issued on the judgment until, on May 22, 1936, the civil court ordered the issuance of such an execution against the right, title, and interest of Adam Musa in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eaton v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Bassler v. RewodlinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Oklahoma State Bank of Wapanucka v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Lee v. KeechCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- People Trust and Savings Bank v. HaasIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Zeigler v. BonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Gau v. HylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Megal Development Corp. v. ShadofWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Estate of Emmet Awtry, Deceased, Nellie Awtry v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Eder v. RothamelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.