Legal Opinion

Coy v. Columbus, Delaware & Marion Electric Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1932No. 23108PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

This case arises as an error proceeding to a judgment of the Court of Appeals of Marion county, which affirmed a judgment of the court of common pleas of that county after that court had sustained a motion of the defendant below to exclude all testimony and to direct a verdict for the defendant upon the ground that the petition did not state a cause of action.

The petition in its material portion reads as follows:

“Plaintiff, Charles H. Coy, is under twenty-one years of age, and brings this action by Thomas O. Coy, his next friend.
“Defendant, The Columbus, Delaware and Marion Electric Company,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wolczek v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. McKiddy v. Des Moines Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Haywood v. South Hill Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  4. Clark v. Longview Public Service Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Costanza v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wills v. Frank Hoover SupplyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. McKinney v. Hartz & Restle Realtors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Soles v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bennett v. StanleyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Stevens v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Pickaway County Court of Common Pleas · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API