Legal Opinion

Soles v. Ohio Edison Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1945No. 29934PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

Defendant insists that it is entitled to judgment in its favor, notwithstanding the verdict.

Section 11601, General Code, provides as follows:

“When, upon the statements in the pleadings or upon the evidence received upon the trial, one party is entitled by law to judgment in his favor, judgment shall be so rendered by the court, although a verdict has been found against such party * * (Italics ours.)

The defendant’s contention is based upon the proposition that the decedent was a trespasser or a licensee, and that it owed him no duty except to refrain from wanton, willful or reckless misconduct…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Coy v. Columbus, Delaware & Marion Electric Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Jeffers v. OlexoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Mudrich v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Wills v. Frank Hoover SupplyOhio Supreme Court · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API