R.B. v. C.W.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.
¶ 1 T.A.W. is an “Indian child” under the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA), 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901-1963, as well as the Washington State Indian Child Welfare Act (WICWA), chapter 13.38 RCW. T.A.W.’s biological father, C.W., is non-Indian,1 and T.A.W.’s mother, C.B., is Indian and an enrolled member of the Shoalwater Bay Tribe.2 C.B. and T.A.W.’s stepfather, R.B.,3 successfully petitioned the trial court to terminate C.W.’s parental rights and to allow R.B. to adopt T.A.W. In reaching its decision, the trial court found that ICWA applied to the termination proceedings and that ICWA’s…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Haaland v. BrackeenSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Haaland v. BrackeenSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Brackeen v. HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- In re Dependency of Z.J.G.Washington Supreme Court · 2020
- In Re The Welfare Of A.l.c.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.