Legal Opinion

People v. Landis

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1903No. Crim. No. 913PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County and from an order denying a new trial. John C. Gray, Judge, refusing to set aside indictment. E. E. Gaddis, Judge, presiding at trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

The appellant was tried and convicted upon an indictment for the crime of forgery in the superior .court of Butte County, and from said judgment of conviction and from the order overruling his motion for a new trial prosecutes this appeal.

Among the errors assigned by the appellant, he contends that the court below erred in overruling his motion to set -aside the indictment. The motion to set aside the indictment was based upon the ground of the disqualification of two of the grand jurors, Dawson and Sweetser, on account of actual •bias. The alleged forgery consisted of a note purporting to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People v. FlannellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Lombardi v. California Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  4. James v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. KempleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. People v. Le DouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. SchmitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API