Thornton-Trump v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WIESE, Judge.
In this motion, two third-party defendants, FMC Corporation and Landoll Corporation (hereinafter “defendants”), ask the court to impose sanctions upon plaintiff’s counsel for alleged violations of RUSCC 26 (g) and Appendix G—“Procedures Before Trial”. Defendants assert that they were put to the expense of conducting a useless deposition as a result of erroneous information contained in plaintiff’s answers to interrogatories. Defendants contend that the mistaken answers were submitted by plaintiff’s counsel without reasonable inquiry into their factual accuracy.
For his part,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- General William C. Westmoreland, Ambassador Richard Helms v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Indianapolis Colts v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- King v. E.F. Hutton & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- Lemelson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Iris Corp. Berhad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Thornton-Trump v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.