Legal Opinion

Eklof v. Waterston

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1929PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

On April 15, 1928, the defendant Bee Hive Anto Service company let for hire to its codefendants, Howard Waterston and Seymour Lee, a sedan automobile and delivered the same to them. While said codefendants were in the possession thereof as bailees, they so negligently operated it that they drove it onto the parking at the corner of Eleventh and Clay streets in the city of Portland and broke off a fire hydrant thereon and ran over and severely injured plaintiff, a pedestrian, who was at the time on the sidewalk at said point. Plaintiff alleged by his amended complaint that at the time he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ChurchesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hopkins v. DroppersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Staples v. SendersOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hilleary v. BromleyOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Vermont Acceptance Corp. v. WiltshireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  4. Kantola v. Lovell Auto Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Berhow v. KroackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API