Poole v. Copland, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McGEE, Judge.
Copland argues the trial court erred by: 1) denying Copland’s motions for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict based upon an alleged insufficiency of evidence of causation; 2) failing to properly instruct the jury on the issue of liability regarding intentional infliction of emotional distress; 3) improperly instructing the jury on causation; 4) instructing the jury twice on the issue of damages and submitting separate damages issues to the jury as to each defendant; and 5) denying Copeland’s post-trial motions for a new trial or amendment of the judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Lockwood v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Taylor v. MetzgerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Travis v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- McLain v. Taco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Watson v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Johnson v. Piggly Wiggly of Pinetops, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.