Legal Opinion

State v. Rollins

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 28, 1997No. 14300PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a plea of nolo contendere, of burglary in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-103. He claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion to suppress his statement, (2) denied his motion to dismiss other cases in which nolles had been entered as part of a plea bargain, and (3) denied his motion to dismiss based on his attorney’s conflict of interest. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The record discloses the following facts. While incarcerated on an unrelated offense, the defendant was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Minnick v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. State v. PiorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RollinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. State v. RollinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API