State v. Rollins
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
*702 Opinion
MCDONALD, J.
The issues in this certified appeal are whether the defendant, Bryant K. Rollins, invoked his right to counsel and whether his subsequent confession without counsel physically present was the result of interrogation initiated by the police in violation of his right to counsel. We conclude that the defendant invoked his right to counsel and that subsequently, through counsel, he initiated a permissible police interview that led to his confession.
It is undisputed that while incarcerated on an unrelated offense, the defendant was arrested and charged with multiple offenses.1…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Patterson v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CanalesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. TappIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. KnoxConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020