Legal Opinion
Turner v. SANOSKI
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 22, 2010No. 2009AP1319PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
¶ 1. Isadore Turner appeals a judgment dismissing his malicious prosecution claim against Matthew Sanoski and Marilyn Jensen. Turner argues the circuit court erred by concluding his claim was time-barred by the two-year statute of limitations set forth in Wis. Stat. § 893.57. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. On March 19, 2002, Sanoski and Jensen told police officers that Turner struck Sanoski in the mouth, chipping a portion of his tooth. As a result, the State charged Turner with substantial battery. On August 21, 2002, following a jury trial, Turner was acquitted of the charge. On February 28,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Segall v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Zastrow v. Journal Communications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Warmka v. Hartland Cicero Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- STATE EX REL. MIRBEAU OF GENEVA LAKE, LLC v. City of Lake GenevaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Munger v. SeehaferCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
- Tilstra v. Bou-Matic, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- A & A Environmental Services, Inc. v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2021