Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Niang

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided March 8, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arlene D. Goldberg, J.

These two dockets have been consolidated by the court for decision on defendant’s omnibus motions in which he seeks identical forms of pretrial relief.

Each of the underlying accusatory instruments charges the defendant with being an unlicensed general vendor (Administrative Code of City of NY § 20.453) and with trademark counterfeiting in the third degree (Penal Law § 165.71).*

In substance, it is alleged that at around midday on two separate dates (Aug. 20, 1993 and Nov. 14, 1993), defendant displayed and offered for sale watches, bearing counterfeit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. MendozaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. InfurnariDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1986
  5. People v. EbramhaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grinberg v. SafirNew York Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. EnsleyCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1999
  3. People v. ThiamCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2001
  4. People v. Wu ChengCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2004
  5. People v. MartinezWhite Plains City Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API