United States v. Infurnari
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CURTIN, Chief Judge.
At the conclusion of jury selection in this case, both parties requested a pretrial ruling from the court as to the elements of the Trademark Counterfeiting Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2320. Counts I and II of the indictment charge defendant with trafficking or attempting to traffic in counterfeit Rolex and Piaget watches, in violation of section 2320. The parties have filed briefs in support of their respective interpretations of the statute.
Section 2320 authorizes criminal sanctions for certain activities involving the use of counterfeit marks. The statute was enacted less than two…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc., and Textiles Y Confecciones Europeas, S.A. v. Levi Strauss & Company, Defendant-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Grotrian, Helfferich, Schulz, Th. Steinweg Nachf. v. Steinway & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Syntex Laboratories, Inc. v. The Norwich Pharmacal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Levi Strauss & Co. v. Blue Bell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. GonzalezDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1986
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Firouz Yamin and Behroz GeramianCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. John TorkingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Nam Ping HonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Myong Hwa SongCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- People v. NiangCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.