Legal Opinion
People v. Ebramha
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided December 22, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Megan Tallmer, J.
This case raises the issue of how the People can satisfy the *218requirement of CPL 100.40 (1) (c) that an information contain nonhearsay allegations establishing every element of the crime charged where the element in question is defendant’s lack of a general vendor’s license. Defendant in this case is charged with unlicensed general vending under section 20-453 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, an essential element of which is that defendant has no license. The only allegations in the original complaint and arresting officer’s supporting…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. ConoscentiNew York District Court · 1975
- People v. GoreCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989
- People v. SyllaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
- People v. DioufCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
- Gravel Products Division of Buffalo Crushed Stone Corp. v. Sunnydale Acres, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. NiangCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1994
- People v. MansonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1997
- People v. EbramhaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1993
- People v. KaidCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995
- People v. CruzCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2014