State v. Bistricky
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
The state raises three issues. Two concern the substantive law questions resulting from the trial court’s rulings, and one challenges the conclusion of the court of appeals that it has no authority to review the trial court’s rulings. Because the court of appeals did not render an opinion or judgment on either of the substantive law issues, we will consider only the issue of whether a court of appeals has authority pursuant to R.C. 2945.67 to grant the state’s request for leave to appeal on substantive law rulings rendered in a criminal case that results in a judgment of acquittal pursuant to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. KeetonOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- State v. BistrickyOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. LomaxOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. EdmondsonOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Adkins v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1996
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.