Legal Opinion

Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 27, 2004No. A03-1866PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.*

*857Appealing the district court’s final judgment in this insurance dispute, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Gompany disputes the court’s conclusion that respondent’s voluntary intoxication was not an event of independent significance, that is, conduct that broke the causative tie between injuries she sustained and her use of a motor vehicle. Appellant also claims that injuries respondent sustained after leaving the vehicle, which was stuck in snow, did not arise out of the use or maintenance of the vehicle. Because we are required to apply no-fault law without…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Engeldinger v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API