Legal Opinion
Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 13, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, Senior Judge.
On June 14, 1991, a group known as the Duquesne Interruptible Complainants1 (DIC) filed a formal complaint before the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) asking the Commission to find the then current $2.00/kw interruptible credit contained in the Duquesne Light Company’s (Duquesne) Rate HVPS (High Voltage Power Service) and Rider No. 7 (Rate L Large Power Service) unjust and unreasonable, in violation of Section 1301 of the Public Utility Code,2 66 Pa.C.S. § 1301. The complaint also requested that the Commission find a just and reasonable interruptible…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pennsylvania Retailers' Associations v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pennsylvania Industrial Energy Coalition v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Energy Conservation Council of Pennsylvania v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997