Keller v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
In this review of an order of the Federal Trade Commission petitioners contend that (1) no substantial evidence supports the finding; (2) the testimony of one witness should have been stricken; (3) the order is broader than the complaint and (4) the proceeding is not in the public interest because petitioners’ practices did not result in injury to competition.
The complaint charged and the Commission found that petitioners, copartners, were in competition with others selling and distributing in interstate commerce to operators of and concessionaries with carnivals,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Federal Trade Commission v. Pacific States Paper Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pedro Amado Torres v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- E. B. Muller & Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Progress Tailoring Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Wolf v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Stanley Laboratories, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.