Legal Opinion
Wolf v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 19, 1943No. 7931PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner seeks review of an order of ■the Federal Trade Commission directing him to cease and desist from using lottery methods and devices in the interstate sale of merchandise. Certain other practices were involved in the order, but petitioner states that these have been discontinued and he does not question the order as to them. He states that the sole issue presented by his petition for review is whether his method of conducting business constitutes the use of lottery methods and devices. The original complaint was directed to a group of four persons, including…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- International Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Metcalf v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin v. State of Wisconsin, Tommy G. Thompson and Donald J. HanawayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Progress Tailoring Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Parke, Austin & Lipscomb, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Marco Sales Company, a Corporation, and Marvin O. Baer, Individually and as an Officer of Said Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.