Legal Opinion

Pedro Amado Torres v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 20, 1959No. 16370PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was indicted on a two count indictment charging him with theft of a movie camera and accessories moving in interstate commerce, and with possession of the same property knowing it to have been stolen from interstate commerce. Both counts were based on 18 U.S.C. § 659.

After trial on both counts, the jury found Torres not guilty of the theft, but guilty of possession. Appellant filed a motion for judgment of acquittal, and, alternately, a motion for a new trial. Each was denied. Timely appeal was taken from the judgment and commitment which sentenced him to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Avery v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. William BentvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. George E. Moore (88-5932) and Charles R. Morse, (88-5942)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. PedersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Alfredo Delgado Arellanes and Geneva Arellanes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API