Legal Opinion
State v. Heineman
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 8, 2021No. 9-20-10PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State v. Heineman,
2021-Ohio-643.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 9-20-10 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. RICHARD HEINEMAN, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Marion Municipal Court Trial Court No. CRB 1903058 Judgment Affirmed Date of Decision: March 8, 2021 APPEARANCES: Carlos M. Crawford for Appellant Michael D. Swartz for Appellee Case No. 9-20-10 WILLAMOWSKI, P.J. {¶1} Defendant-appellant Richard Heineman (“Heineman”) brings this appeal from the judgment of the Marion Municipal Court. On appeal, Heineman claims that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BeattyOhio Court of Appeals · 2026