Copp v. Van Hise
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendants to recover for injuries received by the plaintiff when the automobile in which she was riding with the defendants skidded on a wet pavement and capsized. The verdict and judgment were for plaintiff in the sum of $4,150. Defendants appeal.
The principal question on this appeal is as to the degree of care the defendants were required to exercise in driving the car. The defendants claim that plaintiff was their guest and therefore under the so-called “guest law” of Montana (Rev.Codes of Montana 1935, §§ 1748.1,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barnard v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Smith v. CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- O'Connor v. West Sacramento Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Hammond Coal Co. v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Douglass v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Utility Service, Inc. v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Soldano v. HolmesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- United States v. SteinerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Rusk v. SkillmanMontana Supreme Court · 1973
- Rusk v. SkillmanMontana Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.