National Bank of Commerce v. Ritter
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(aifter stating the facts). It is conceded that the only question presented by the appeal is whether L. V. Ritter has a vested interest under the terms of his father’s will which may in equity be subjected to the payment of appellant’s judgment ag’ainst him. Counsel for appellant insist that the proper interpretation of the will is that L. Y. Ritter took under the will a vested remainder upon the death of the testator, and that his interest could be sold under execution issued in favor of appellant under its judgment against him during the life estate of the widow. On the other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brandenburg v. ThorndikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Hurst v. HilderbrandtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Eversmeyer v. McCollumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Jenkins v. Packingtown Realty CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Liberty Central Trust Co. v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
3Cited by11 opinions
- Deener v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Dickerson v. Union Nat. Bank of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Greer v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Fletcher v. HurdleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Adamson v. Wolfe, TrusteeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.