Legal Opinion

Eversmeyer v. McCollum

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 17, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The decision of the chancellor is based upon the theory that the deed of T. E. Billingsley and wife to the 220 acres of land in Hempstead County, Arkansas, conveyed a life estate to Mary Pool with the remainder to Dr. W. H. B. Pool, who was found to be her son.

In the first place it is sought to reverse the decree upon the theory that the Billingsley deed conveyed the fee to Mary Pool, under the rule in Shelley’s Case, as declared in Hardage v. Stroope, 58 Ark. 303, and Ryan v. Ryan, 138 Ark. 362.

Mary Pool and Philander Pool, her husband, conveyed the land…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Horsley v. HilburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  2. Watson v. Wolff-Goldman Realty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Hardage v. StroopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  4. Georgia State Savings Ass'n v. DearingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Gray v. McGuireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hurst v. HilderbrandtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Pletner v. Southern Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. National Bank of Commerce v. RitterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Fletcher v. HurdleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  5. Adams v. EagleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API