Legal Opinion

Deener v. Watkins

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 11, 1935No. 4-4034PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

On February 17, 1928, W. D. Watkins was indebted to the Blanton Company, and, to evidence this indebtedness, on that date with his wife, Zula, executed a note secured by a deed of trust on an undivided one-fifth interest in two tracts of land situated in White County, Arkansas. Suit ivas brought for judgment on the note, and for foreclosure of the mortgage. W. D. Watkins died, and the suit was revived in the name of his heirs. An answer and intervention were filed, which in effect defended on the ground that W. D. Watkins, the mortgagor, had no interest of any nature in the lands mortgaged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Horsley v. HilburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  2. Watson v. Wolff-Goldman Realty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Hurst v. HilderbrandtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Bradley Lumber Co. of Ark. v. BurbridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  3. Dyer v. LaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  4. Greer v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  5. Steele v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API