Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Union Nat. Bank of Little Rock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 24, 1980No. 80-32PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The principal question on this appeal is whether a trust created by the holographic will of Nina Martin Dickerson, who died on June 21, 1967, is void under the rule against perpetuities, because it is possible that the interest of the various beneficiaries may not vest within the period allowed by that rule. Cecil H. Dickerson, Jr., one of the testatrix’s two sons, attacks the validity of the trust. The chancellor rejected Cecil’s attack on two grounds; First, Cecil should have raised the question of the validity of the trust in the probate court in connection with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robertson v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Hurst v. HilderbrandtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. National Bank of Commerce v. RitterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Comstock v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Steele v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Elam v. Hyatt Legal ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Covenant Presbytery v. First Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Gahr v. TrammelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. Cox v. KeaheyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Deltic Timber Corp. v. NewlandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API