Siegel v. Netherlands Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 82, Oct. T., 1914, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1912, No. 3,579, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Abraham Siegel v. The Netherlands Company, Inc. Trespass to recover damages for an alleged wrongful attachment of a stock of goods.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 82, Oct. T., 1914, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1912, No. 3,579, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Abraham Siegel v. The Netherlands Company, Inc. Trespass to recover damages for an alleged wrongful attachment of a stock of goods. Before Patterson, J. From the record it appeared that the writ of attachment indicated that Joseph J. Goldsmith was indebted to the Netherlands Company in the sum of $7,500. The affidavit for the writ averred that the defendant had removed a part of his property and effects, and was about to remove his property out…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kephart, J.,
Plaintiff was the owner of a store at 129 N. Eighth street, Philadelphia, having purchased it from Joseph Goldsmith November 1, 1911. Goldsmith owned another store at 830 Chestnut street, having leased the room for this store from the defendant in this case. On November 27, 1911, Goldsmith removed all the goods from the Chestnut street store, whereupon the defendant caused an attachment to be issued under the fraudulent debtor’s act of 1869, to attach goods of the defendant at 129 N. Eighth street, the claim being for rent for the balance of the term for the Chestnut…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mayer v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Welsh v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- Grohmann v. KirschmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Hyde v. KiehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Rogers v. SchadtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Robert F. Jennings v. Arthur Shuman, Jr., Robert J. Conway, Gustave Naring, and John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Morphy v. ShipleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Garland v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Shane v. Gulf Refining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Summit Hosiery Co. v. GottschallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.