Marriage of Meleen v. Meleen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Appellant moved to increase child support. The court found the factors present to increase support, but did not apply the guidelines. We affirm in part, reverse and remand in part.
FACTS
The parties’ marriage was dissolved in 1973. Appellant was then on AFDC. She presently is employed earning a gross yearly salary of $17,000. Respondent’s income in 1973 is not of record, but in 1981 he earned a gross salary of $25,000 per year. In 1984 his gross yearly salary was $34,-500. His net was not determined, but is between $1,600 and $1,800 per month. There has been no change in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hadrava v. HadravaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Neary v. NearyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Erickson v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marriage of Smith v. OcellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987