Legal Opinion
Hechtman v. Savitsky
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 10, 2001No. AC 20072PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The plaintiff, Andrew Hechtman, is the executor1 of his mother’s estate and appeals from that portion of the trial court’s judgment that found that the defendant, Allan Savitsky, had not committed waste or negligence as a life tenant. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) determined that the defendant was not obligated to pay the interest due on a home equity loan that encumbered the property and (2) considered matters extrinsic to the will and outside the record. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are necessary to our resolution of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hayward v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- State v. TomanelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Phaneuf v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Housing Authority v. LamotheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- DiSesa v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lyon v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- In Re Jorden R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. LesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- State v. HopkinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- New Image Contractors, LLC v. Village at Mariner's Point Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.