Legal Opinion

The Journal Sentinel, Inc. v. Schultz

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 4, 2001No. 00-2595PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

¶ 1. John R. Schultz appeals from an order of the circuit court concluding that fifty percent of his wages are subject to garnishment to satisfy a judgment held by Charles J. Sykes, Journal Broadcast Group, Inc., and Journal Sentinel, Inc., against his wife, Cynthia Schultz. John argues that his wages should be exempt from garnishment because he and his wife have a marital property agreement that classifies his wages as individual property. Alternatively, John asserts that the garnishment violates several of his constitutional rights. We conclude that John and Cynthia's marital property…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paul Davis Restoration of S.E. Wisconsin, Inc. v. Paul Davis Restoration of Northeast WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Eric L. BizeauUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2025
  3. Nelson v. Alliance Hospitality Mgmt., LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2013
  4. Paul Davis Restoration of S.E. Wisconsin, Inc. v. Paul Davis Restoration of Northeast WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Schultz v. Journal Sentinel, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API