Legal Opinion
Paul Davis Restoration of S.E. Wisconsin, Inc. v. Paul Davis Restoration of Northeast Wisconsin
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 2013No. 2011AP001121PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.
¶ 1. This case centers on a garnishment action in which the alleged judgment debtor challenged the ability of the judgment creditor to enforce a judgment by garnishment. The case arises from territory-related disputes between two franchisees, Paul Davis Restoration of S.E. Wisconsin, Inc. (Southeast) and Paul Davis Restoration of Northeast Wisconsin (Northeast). Pursuant to the franchise agreement, binding arbitration is prescribed to resolve such disputes, and the results of an arbitration process included an award for Southeast in the amount of $101,693 against Northeast, which is the name…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- John Baxter Butler, Administrator of the Estate of Agnes Adeline Butler, Deceased v. Billy N. Polk, Etc., United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Duval v. Midwest Auto City, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1977
- Susie Randolph v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Hughes v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Johnson v. Cintas Corp. No. 2Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rock Hemp Corp. v. Adam DunnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- VanHuss v. Kohn Law Firm S.C.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2015
- J.P. Michaels, LLC v. Sun Seekers by RosieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
- Paul Davis Restoration of S.E. Wisconsin, Inc. v. Paul Davis Restoration of Northeast WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013