Legal Opinion
Scogin v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 14, 1995No. 94-1068LPublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(4) for failure to state a claim upon *286which relief can be granted. Plaintiff has opposed. Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
The following facts are derived from plaintiffs complaint. Virgil J. Scogin, Sr. (“plaintiff”), owns an industrial parcel of approximately 7.8 acres abutting the Bayou Bonfouca Superfund Site (the “Site”). The Site, an abandoned creosote wood treatment facility located in the City of Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana, consists of approximately 53 acres,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rose M. Clark v. National Travelers Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- Minehan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Lengen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Moore v. Public Defenders OfficeUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Shalhoub v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.