Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 9, 1962No. 48682PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Commissioner.

Robert W. Chambers was a heavy equipment operator employed by the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company. Beginning in January 1959, his job was to operate a “dozer and buggy,” earth moving machinery consisting of a bulldozer attached to a large scoop or “bucket.” He claims that he was not familiar with the clutches or other mechanism by which the buggy was controlled and that, except to grease, casually inspect and operate, he had not been instructed in the repair of the machinery. In this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C.A. § 51), Chambers claims…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Wilcox v. CoonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. Gordon v. Muehling Packing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. State v. ArmsteadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harp v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Mahan v. Missouri Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Johnson v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Pyles v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. Arnold v. EdelmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API