State v. Armstead
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OSDOL, Commissioner.
Defendant was convicted of knowingly receiving money, without any consideration therefor, from the earnings of a woman engaged in prostitution. Section 563.040 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S. His punishment was assessed at six years in the penitentiary. He has appealed from the judgment entered.
Herein defendant-appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction and the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal.
Evidence was introduced tending to show that Jo Ann Huckleberry, a married woman but separated from her husband,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- State v. ThursbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- State v. ChittimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Crawford v. ArendsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- State v. MobleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State v. GravesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- State v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. RobbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.