Legal Opinion

State v. Armstead

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 14, 1955No. 44699PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OSDOL, Commissioner.

Defendant was convicted of knowingly receiving money, without any consideration therefor, from the earnings of a woman engaged in prostitution. Section 563.040 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S. His punishment was assessed at six years in the penitentiary. He has appealed from the judgment entered.

Herein defendant-appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction and the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal.

Evidence was introduced tending to show that Jo Ann Huckleberry, a married woman but separated from her husband,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. State v. ThursbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. State v. ChittimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. Crawford v. ArendsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. State v. MobleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. State v. GravesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. State v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State v. RobbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API