Johnson v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Commissioner.
This is the third trial and appeal of an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act and it is not necessary therefore to again detail the circumstances as the jury could and did find them. The testimony was substantially the same in all three trials and of necessity the railroad concedes, as the court held upon the first appeal, that in at least two particulars its liability was a jury question. Johnson v. Missouri-K.-T. R. Co., (Mo.) 334 S.W.2d 41; Johnson v. Missouri-K.-T. R. Co., (Mo.) 355 S.W.2d 32. It is sufficient here to say that the plaintiff Johnson was a…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dempsey v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Moss v. Mindlin's, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Hayes v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Brock v. Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Murphy v. ColeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tietjens v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Hefele v. National Super Markets, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. HufferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.