Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Edelman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 13, 1964No. 49683PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, Commissioner.

Action for damages for personal injuries sustained by a city employee using the revolving doors in City Hall in Kansas City. Plaintiff Hattie Arnold sued the contractors who installed the doors, John H. Edelman *169and T. Lowrie Lyon, a partnership, for $100,000. A jury returned a verdict for $36,000. Defendants have appealed from a judgment against them for $30,000, to which figure the verdict was reduced by re-mittitur.

Plaintiff charged negligent failure of defendants to set the panic-exit device on the revolving doors at the proper pressure to prevent collapse of the doors…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Feeney & Sheehan Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. McCaffery v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Baker v. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Enyart v. Santa Fe Trail Transp. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  5. Brown v. PayneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arnold v. EdelmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API