Legal Opinion

Dana Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1983No. Appeals, 834 C.D. 1982 and 1245 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

These are the consolidated appeals of the Dana Corporation (Dana) and The Hartford Insurance Group (The Hartford) from orders of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the award of benefits to two Dana employees. We affirm.

Michael Savage and Joseph A. Wisniewski (Claimants) were both employed by the Dana Corporation for more than thirty years. Savage was employed as a welder and assemblyman and Wisniewski was employed as a welder and utility man. In 1979, both men filed claim petitions seeking compensation for a complete loss of hearing in both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boeing Helicopter Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Brooks v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Eddy v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. B.P. Oil Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Martin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API