Legal Opinion

Martin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1987No. Appeal, No. 1110 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Barbieri,

Charles Martin (Petitioner) appeals from the dismissal of his workmens compensation petition for hear*202ing loss as time barred under Sections 311 and 315 of The Pennsylvania Workmen's Compensation Act, 77 P.S. §§631 and 602 respectively.1 We affirm the order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) dismissing the petition. At the time of the referees hearing, Petitioner was a 61 year old man who had been employed in the mill of Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation for 34 years. He testified that he first began experiencing hearing problems in 1974 which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. GriffithCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Dana Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Babcock & Wilcox & Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Winkelman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eddy v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Hermanson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Martin v. WCAB (JONES & L. STEEL C.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. USAir, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. USAir, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API