Legal Opinion
MM Global Services, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 11, 2004No. CIV. 302CV1107AVCPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
COVELLO, District Judge.
This is an action for damages arising from a business arrangement pursuant to which the plaintiffs purchased chemicals, polymers, and other products from the defendants and resold them to customers located in India. The amended complaint alleges violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and common law tenets concerning breach of contract and negligent misrepresentation. The defendants now move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) to dismiss the federal antitrust claim for want…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Capitol Leasing Company v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Antares Aircraft, L.P. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, and Nigerian Airports AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap as v. HeereMac VofCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Empagran S.A. v. F. Hoffman-LaRoche, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (Dram)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- In Re Dynamic Random Access MemoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Centerprise International, Ltd. v. Micron Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Conopco, Inc. v. Arkema, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.