Centerprise International, Ltd. v. Micron Technology, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed at 538 F.3d 1107, 1110 (9th Cir. Aug.14, 2008) is amended as follows:
At pg. 1110, insert new footnote 3 after “B. Subject Matter Jurisdiction” 3:
3 The district court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, which was premised solely on jurisdictional grounds. It is unclear, however, whether the FTAIA is more appropriately viewed as withdrawing jurisdiction from the federal courts when a plaintiff fails to establish proximate cause or as simply establishing a limited cause of action requiring plaintiffs to prove proximate cause as an element of the claim. Compare Empagran…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Elevator Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (Dram)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008