Legal Opinion

Begovich v. Murphy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1960No. Docket 18, Calendar 48,373PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

In this case, the administrator of the estate of a deceased person seeks recovery of $4,000 of legal fees paid to defendant as counsel for the deceased, on the claim that that portion of the fees paid represented an advance payment for which no services were rendered by defendant because of the prior suicide of the deceased.

The declaration was dismissed on motion without trial. The relevant portion of the declaration recites the facts which are before us and which on this appeal, of course, we assume to be true:

“1. That he is the administrator of the estate of Nicholas Begovich, deceased. * *…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woods v. AyresMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Eggleston v. BoardmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Lyon v. MinorMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. City of Detroit v. WhittemoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Currier Lumber Co. Ex Rel. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Van EveryMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harriman v. TetikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. In Re Doors and More, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
  3. Maljak v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Maljak v. MurphyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Maljak v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API