Woods v. Ayres
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Huron. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
In the fall of 1871 a claim in favor of the firm of Ayres, Learned & Wiswall arose against plaintiffs in error for four dollars per thousand feet upon a quantity of pine saw logs delivered by the firm to plaintiffs in error under an agreement for their delivery subject to that drawback, to replace others the firm had cut on lands of the plaintiffs in error. The members of the firm in whose favor 'the claim arose were Ebenezer Wiswall, Charles G. Learned and defendant in error Frederick S. Ayres. November 6, 1871, this firm was succeeded by that of “ Ayres, Learned & Co.,” composed of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Sullivan v. Portland & Kennebec RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Boston Ice Co. v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Simson v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Livonia Property Holdings, L.L.C. v. 12840-12976 Farmington Road Holdings, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- United States v. Samuel Neidorf and Maria Glickman, of the Estate of Mannes n.glickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Maasdam v. Estate of MaasdamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- United States Ex Rel. Hargis v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.