Legal Opinion

Metz v. Bae Systems Technology Solutions and Services Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1694PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GLADYS KESSLER, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Stephen D. Metz (“Plaintiff’ or “Metz”) brings this diversity action against Defendant BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services, Inc. (“Defendant” or “BAE”) alleging violations of the common law of the District of Columbia.

This matter is presently before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint [Dkt. No. 13]. Upon consideration of the Motion, Opposition [Dkt. No. 19], Reply [Dkt. No. 20], and the entire record herein, and for the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  4. Paul v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Richard W. Shear v. The National Rifle Association of America, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metz v. BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  2. Cummings v. MurphyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  3. McKinney v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API