Legal Opinion
Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 9, 1953No. 154, Docket 22534PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
This is an action for relief under the antitrust laws, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 15, 16, involving the operation of moving picture theatres in Hollywood, California, the restraint of trade relied on being the control of movie distribution condemned in the Paramount case, United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 66 F.Supp. 323; Id., D.C., 70 F.Supp. 53; Id., D.C., 85 F.Supp. 881; Id., 334 U.S. 131, 68 S.Ct. 915, 92 L.Ed. 1260; United States v. Loew’s, Inc., 339 U.S. 974, 70 S.Ct. 1032, 94 L.Ed. 1380. Plaintiff Fanchon & Marco, Inc., owns fifty per cent of the stock of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Meyer v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- American Safety Equipment Corp. v. J. P. Maguire & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Sandor Schwartz v. Cyrus S. Eaton, Walter J. Tuohy, and Cyrus S. Eaton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.