Legal Opinion

Grand v. St. Louis & San Francisco Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1924No. 14660PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, O.

This is an action brought by plaintiff in error against the defendant in error to recover damages for personal injuries due to' the alleged negligence of defendant in error.

The parties will be referred fo as they appeared in the trial court.

The negligence alleged in the petition is that the plaintiff was an employe of the defendant, working as a section hand and that while working he was using a jack, which was being furnished by said defend.ant, in raising and lifting one side of the ■ defendant’s railway track, which was done iby the aid of said jack and a bar; that by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Looney v. Metropolitan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrazzellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. GraneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Vorbrich v. Geuder & Paeschke Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Palmer v. Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  2. Wright v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. McCracken v. Franco-Dominion Development Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API